Contributors
813.229.4304
407.244.8235
813.229.4301
202.965.8181
813.229.4362
305.347.6823
305.347.6990
860.392.5038
305.539.7309
561.650.0354
561.822.2972
561.650.8014
305.539.7230
202.295.6525
212.380.9612
305.539.7330
860.392.5053
202.965.8129
202.965.8126
202.965.8107
   
  
  
   
(Click to edit)


Seventh Circuit Opines On Dispute Between Class Action Lawyers On How To Divvy Up Settlement Proceeds

April 6, 2012 10:07 AM | Posted by D. Matthew Allen | Print this page
In the usual class action case, plaintiff’s lawyers work out among themselves how an attorney fee will be distributed amongst themselves should a settlement be reached. Sometimes, however, when that is not the case, the court must decide the issue. In In re Trans Union Corporation Privacy Litigation, 664 F.3d 1031 (7th Cir. 2011), the Seventh Circuit entered the fray. A law firm who represented individual claimants wanted to be added “to the docket in this appeal” but did not seek intervention as a party. The court noted that the law firm was trying to have it both ways because, on the one hand, it did not want to give up any of its attorney’s fees to class counsel, but on the other hand, it did not want the courts to question its fee arrangements with its clients. The court ruled that it couldn’t have its cake and eat it too, and that it was a party to the litigation for purposes of evaluating its fee arrangement. So there.

Related Information

Related Attorneys

Related Services