Contributors
813.229.4304
407.244.8235
813.229.4301
202.965.8181
813.229.4362
305.347.6823
305.347.6990
860.392.5038
305.539.7309
561.650.0354
561.822.2972
561.650.8014
305.539.7230
202.295.6525
212.380.9612
305.539.7330
860.392.5053
202.965.8129
202.965.8126
202.965.8107
   
  
  
   
(Click to edit)


From Picking Citrus to Fighting for Proper Wages: Migrant Farm Workers Have Standing to Bring Class Action

April 11, 2012 5:30 PM | Posted by Tinsley, Katie | Print this page
In Garcia-Celestino v. Ruiz Harvesting, Inc., 2012 WL 602728, at * 1 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 24, 2012), the Middle District of Florida granted class certification to 38 migrant farm workers with respect to their claims that a central Florida citrus farmer, who employed approximately 286 Mexican migrant workers under a single contract, breached a contract with the workers and failed to pay minimum wage in violation of Florida’s Constitution.  Prior to determining whether the elements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 were satisfied, the Court was required to accept Plaintiff’s substantive allegations as true when determining whether the migrant workers had Article III standing.  Because plaintiffs alleged the citrus farmer employed the migrant workers pursuant to a federal foreign agricultural worker program and because plaintiffs alleged the citrus farmer damaged them by failing to pay the appropriate wage rate, unlawfully deducting travel time, and failing to properly reimburse the workers for their expenses, the Court found the migrant farm workers had standing to bring a class action claim.   The Court went on to determine that Plaintiffs satisfied the requirements of Rule 23(a) and Rule 23(b)(3).

Related Information

Related Attorneys

Related Services