Contributors
813.229.4304
407.244.8235
813.229.4301
202.965.8181
813.229.4362
305.347.6823
305.347.6990
860.392.5038
305.539.7309
561.650.0354
561.822.2972
561.650.8014
305.539.7230
202.295.6525
212.380.9612
305.539.7330
860.392.5053
202.965.8129
202.965.8126
202.965.8107
   
  
  
   
(Click to edit)


Citing Concepcion, Florida Supreme Court Declines to Entertain Consumer Class Action Waivers

July 30, 2012 1:31 PM | Posted by Kirkwood, Allison | Print this page

In January 2010, the Eleventh Circuit certified questions to the Florida Supreme Court regarding class actions waivers in consumer contracts in Pendergast v. Sprint Nextel Corp., 592 F.3d 1119 (11th Cir. 2010). More specifically, the Eleventh Circuit certified questions to the court asking how contractual unconscionability should be analyzed under Florida law and whether a class action waiver in an agreement to arbitrate in a consumer contract for cellular telephone service is unconscionable under Florida law. In April 2011, the United States Supreme Court addressed these issues in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. __ (2011), and held that state law decisions that find class action waivers in arbitration clauses to be unconscionable or void as against public policy were preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act. Thus, despite state laws to the contrary, Concepcion allows companies to enforce contract provisions that require customers to arbitrate their disputes individually.

In light of the Supreme Court’s intervening decision in Concepcion, on July 17, 2012, the Florida Supreme Court declined jurisdiction to decide the certified questions and returned Pendergast to the Eleventh Circuit. The Eleventh Circuit itself had previously stated that “had we had Concepcion before us at the time of our initial consideration of this appeal, we would not have certified questions to the Florida Supreme Court.”

Related Information

Related Services