Contributors
813.229.4304
407.244.8235
813.229.4301
202.965.8181
813.229.4362
305.347.6823
305.347.6990
860.392.5038
305.539.7309
561.650.0354
561.822.2972
561.650.8014
305.539.7230
202.295.6525
212.380.9612
305.539.7330
860.392.5053
202.965.8129
202.965.8126
202.965.8107
   
  
  
   
(Click to edit)


Growing Trend: District Court Strikes Class Action Allegations at Pleading Stage

August 17, 2012 9:30 AM | Posted by Clark, Johanna | Print this page
In Vandenbrink v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2012 WL 3156596 (M.D. Fla. 2012), Plaintiffs alleged, on behalf of a putative class, that State Farm breached its insurance policies when it subrogated its prior Medical Payment Coverage payments against Plaintiffs where those Plaintiffs had not been “made whole” in their settlements with their respective tortfeasors. Under well-established Florida law, an insured must be “made whole” in her recovery from a third party tortfeasor before the insurer may directly subrogate from the insured. In analyzing the class allegations at the pleading stage, Judge Moody concluded that because the threshold issue is whether the Plaintiffs were "made whole" through their settlements with their respective tortfeasors, if this case were to proceed, the most important issues to settle would be “individual in nature.” The individual factual inquiries of 1) damages incurred by an individual plaintiff, 2) the amount of the settlement and 3) the portions of the settlement that were actually paid for medical payments, would predominate making class litigation “highly impractical.”